Fresh details emerging from an ongoing coup trial in Abuja are raising concerns about gaps in intelligence reporting and internal accountability within Nigeria’s security system, following the presentation of video evidence by the Federal Government.
At a sitting of the Federal High Court on Monday, prosecutors played recorded statements from six defendants accused of plotting to overthrow the administration of President Bola Tinubu. Those on trial include retired Major General Mohammed Ibrahim Gana, retired Naval Captain Erasmus Ochegobia Victor, Police Inspector Ahmed Ibrahim, and three others, all facing charges ranging from treason to terrorism-related offences.
The footage, according to prosecutors, shows that some of the accused were aware of the alleged plot but failed to alert authorities. Retired Captain Victor admitted knowing about discussions to topple the government but said he did not report it due to his personal relationship with the alleged coordinator, while Inspector Ibrahim acknowledged involvement in reconnaissance activities around the Presidential Villa.
Investigators told the court that the serving police officer allegedly took photographs of sensitive locations within the State House and discussed access routes, using coded language in communications. He also admitted receiving funds linked to the plot, though he claimed his actions were influenced by poor judgment and that he did not believe the plan could succeed.
In contrast, retired Major General Gana denied any knowledge of a coup plan, telling investigators he only knew the alleged mastermind in a professional capacity. He admitted forwarding messages critical of the government and receiving funds traced by investigators but maintained that he neither initiated nor supported any attempt to overthrow the state.
The case also drew attention to broader accountability issues, with defence lawyers challenging the admissibility of the video evidence on grounds that the statements were not made voluntarily. The court, however, allowed the footage to be played and ordered a separate inquiry to determine whether the confessions were obtained in line with legal standards.
Authorities allege that the defendants, in September 2025, failed to take reasonable steps to prevent a treasonable act despite having prior knowledge. The trial has been adjourned to continue on Tuesday, as security agencies and the judiciary examine not only the alleged plot but also the systems meant to detect and prevent such threats before they escalate.
